${site.data.firmName}${SEMFirmNameAlt}
Call Us 24/7. No Fees Unless We Win.
1-844-ELK-WEST
Email (1-844-355-9378)
Call Us 24/7. No Fees Unless We Win.
1-844-ELK-WEST
Email (1-844-355-9378)
Main Menu Our Offices

Negligent entrustment explained

It may be widely assumed amongst many in Seattle that teen drivers pose a greater risk to other motorists than adults. Yet is there any evidence to back up this assumption, and if there is, could those entrust teens with vehicles also be held liable for any car accidents they may cause? 

Statistics show that drivers between the ages of 16-19 are three times as likely to be involved in a fatal motor vehicle accident than those over the age of 20. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention list the following car accident risks factors as being particularly prevalent among teens: 

  • Not recognizing dangerous driving conditions
  • Speeding
  • Driving during late hours
  • Drinking and driving
  • Not wearing seat belts
  • Following other vehicles too closely

All of these risk factors are related to a single element plaguing all teen drivers: inexperience. Of course, in order to gain the experience needed to develop safe driving skills, teens need to be allowed on the road. Unfortunately, that experience may come at the risk of others. 

Could a parent or guardian that allows a teen access to a car be held liable for the teen's subsequent actions? The legal doctrine of negligent entrustment assigns such fault in these situations. Appellate court rulings in Washington have established the standard for applying negligent entrustment to a case. For it to qualify, the person who entrusted the vehicle to another had to have known that party to be reckless, heedless or incompetent behind the wheel. Furthermore, the person had to have been able to foresee the potential consequences of entrusting the vehicle to the negligent party. In order for past conduct to be cited as proof of one's recklessness, it must to have been frequent enough to make assuming it to continue plausible. 

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • Super Lawyers SUPER LAWYERS | Super Lawyers selects outstanding lawyers after a thorough selection process which includes peer nominations, thorough evaluations and research on the attorneys. Those attorneys selected for inclusion on the list of Super Lawyers have demonstrated strong recognition by their peers and also have significant professional accomplishments.
  • AV LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell Pier Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability MARTINDALE-HUBBELL | Based upon the surveys of their colleagues, Martindale-Hubbell's peer review ratings are designed to provide an objective standard to judge a lawyer's ethical standards and legal ability. The ratings are based upon the lawyer's legal knowledge, analytical capabilities, judgment, communication ability and legal experience. An AV Preeminent rating demonstrates that the lawyer's peers rate the lawyer as having the highest ethical and legal standards. A BV Distinguished rated lawyer's peers believe the lawyer has excellent standards and experience.
  • TopVerdict.com - United States - Top 100 US Verdicts - All Practice Areas - 2014 - Phillip A. Kuri TopVerdict.com | Top Verdict recognizes U.S. law firms and attorneys who have obtained one of the highest jury verdicts in the Nation or an individual State, in a particular area of law and year.
  • Multi Million Dollar Advocates ForumMULTI-MILLION DOLLAR ADVOCATES FORUM | Attorneys who have won multi-million dollar verdicts or settlements can apply for membership with the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum.  Less than 1% of lawyers throughout the country are members of these forums, which were created to recognize the superior legal skills.
  • Avvo AVVO RATINGS | Designed to help people choose lawyers, the AVVO ratings use a mathematical model to rate lawyers objectively based upon the lawyer's qualifications. The calculation includes consideration of the lawyer's years of experience, achievements, recognition by other legal professionals and whether disciplinary action has been taken against the lawyer.
  • American Association for Justice AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | The American Association for Justice, also known as the Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA®), is a membership organization that supports plaintiff trial lawyers.  The AAJ provides services such as publications, listings of members, continuing legal education, training, and advocacy for the trial bar. Founded 1946.
  • NBTA National Board of Trial Advocacy Est. 1977 NATIONAL BOARD OF TRIAL ADVOCATES | To receive specialty certification from the American Bar Association's National Board of Trial Advocacy requires that attorneys meet strict quality requirements and have significant experience. The process of certification requires an examination, an evaluation of the applicant's writing sample and peer reviews.
  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS | The National Trial Lawyers is composed of the top 100 trial lawyers from each state who are invited to join as members based on their excellent qualifications. Among other characteristics, the organization considers the lawyer's reputation and influence.
  • Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms | U.S. News and World Report 2017 U.S. NEWS AND BEST LAWYERS | Elk & Elk is proud to be listed as one of the top law firms in the country by U.S. News and Best Lawyers.
  • Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms | U.S. News and World Report 2018 U.S. NEWS AND BEST LAWYERS | Elk & Elk is proud to be listed as one of the top law firms in the country by U.S. News and Best Lawyers.

Main Office Seattle Office
1325 4th Avenue
Suite 1700
Seattle, WA 98101

Kentucky Office

Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters.